+ Admission for creation of an AV fistula
ACS 1438 Chronic kidney disease, kidney replacement therapy provides the following classification advice:
- Cases of chronic kidney disease with ongoing kidney replacement therapy, whether by dialysis or by transplant, which comply with ACS 0002, require a code from N18.- Chronic kidney disease to describe the current stage of disease, except in routine dialysis only admissions.
- For routine dialysis only admissions it can be assumed from the assignment of Z49.1 Extracorporeal dialysis or Z49.2 Other dialysis that the patient has CKD - stage 5 (see also ACS 1404 Admission for kidney dialysis).
Does the same apply for patients admitted for creation of an AV fistula? Is a CKD code required,
or should CKD only be assigned if it meets the criteria in ACS 0002 Additional diagnoses?
When a patient is admitted specifically for creation of an AV fistula assign Z49.0 Preparatory care
for dialysis as the principal diagnosis. An additional code for CKD should be assigned if it meets the
criteria in ACS 0002 Additional diagnoses.
+ Alcohol poisoning
When should the code for acute alcohol intoxication (F10.0) versus poisoning by alcohol (T51.0) be assigned?
Clinical advice indicates that alcohol poisoning is a particularly severe form of alcohol intoxication.
Typically, alcohol poisoning is characterised by major disturbance of conscious level, inability to
rouse the patient and resultant threat to life requiring supportive treatment.
Coders should be guided by the documentation in the clinical record. Where acute alcohol intoxication
is documented, assign F10.0 Mental and behavioural disorders due to the use of alcohol, acute intoxication
following the index pathway:
Intoxication
- alcoholic (acute) (with) F10.0
Where alcohol poisoning is documented, assign T51.0 Toxic effect of alcohol, Ethanol following the index pathway:
Poisoning (acute) (see also Table of drugs and chemicals)
Table of Drugs and Chemicals
Alcohol
- beverage T51.0
and appropriate external cause of injury codes.
See also ACS 0503 Drug, alcohol and tobacco use disorders and ACS 1903 Two or more drugs taken in combination.
+ Anaemia in neoplastic disease
Please clarify the following:
a. For a patient admitted with the following additional diagnoses:
Anaemia and melaena ? cause
Patient is transfused with 1 unit of packed red blood cells (Hb 9.2)
Patient is also noted to have prostate cancer, not treated or investigated at this admission and
therefore does not meet ACS 0002 Additional diagnoses for code assignment.
Should the anaemia be coded to D63.0 Anaemia in neoplastic disease with additional codes for
the neoplasm assigned or should the anaemia alone be coded?
The index pathway for 'Anaemia, in neoplastic disease' should not be followed in the scenario cited
where the 'anaemia' and 'melaena' are clearly documented as due to an unknown cause. In this instance
code the anaemia alone.
b. The following advice was issued in Coding Matters Vol 6, No 1:
'Code D63.0* Anaemia in neoplastic disease should be assigned when anaemia occurs in, due to or
with a neoplastic condition. The specific code for the neoplasm should be assigned when known, as indicated
by the inclusion term:
D63.0* Anaemia in neoplastic disease
Conditions in Chapter 2 (C00-D48).'
Does this advice still apply?
The NCCH acknowledges there has been difficulty in applying this advice, particularly where the anaemia is unrelated to the neoplasm. It was not intended for this code to be assigned where the anaemia has been documented as due to an unknown cause or a non-neoplastic condition.
The codes in category D63 Anaemia in chronic diseases classified elsewhere have been revised for ICD-10-AM Seventh Edition.
+ Art therapy
Should there be an allied health code in ACHI for art therapy?
ACHI contains a number of codes in block [1916] Generalised allied health interventions that identify
specific allied health specialties. ACHI also contains an intervention code for art therapy, 96181-00
[1873] Art therapy.
ACS 0032 Allied health interventions provides the following advice for assignment of general and specific allied health intervention codes:
'... clinical coders are encouraged to use the more specific codes for allied health interventions to
better represent the interventions performed.'
Therefore, assign specific allied health intervention codes where the documentation is available. So
for documentation of art therapy in the clinical record, assign 96181-00 [1873] Art therapy.
+ Bairnsdale ulcer
What is the correct code for a Bairnsdale ulcer?
A Bairnsdale ulcer is synonymous with a Buruli ulcer, which is indexed in ICD-10-AM. Therefore, the
correct code to assign for a Bairnsdale ulcer is A31.1 Cutaneous mycobacterial infection.
Improvements to the Alphabetic Index will be considered for a future edition of ICD-10-AM.
+ BK virus
What is the correct code to assign for BK virus?
The BK virus is a type of human polyomavirus that infects most people but generally causes no symptoms.
The virus was first isolated in 1971 from the urine of a renal transplant patient, with initials B.K.
This virus is normally latent, however, it may be reactivated in immunocompromised or immunosuppressed
patients. It is believed to be the cause of nephropathy, nephritis and haemorrhagic cystitis in organ
transplant recipients.
The correct code to assign for BK virus is B97.8 Other viral agents as the cause of diseases classified
to other chapters by following the index pathway:
Infection, infected
- virus NEC
- - specified type NEC
- - - as cause of disease classified elsewhere B97.8
Codes from category B95-B97 Bacterial, viral and other infectious agents are not intended for use as
principal diagnoses. As indicated in the code titles, they are provided for use as supplementary or
additional codes to identify the infectious agent(s) in diseases classified elsewhere. See 10-AM Commandments
Vol. 13 No. 4.
+ Correction of forefoot deformity
A patient is admitted for correction of a forefoot deformity. The ACHI pathway, Correction, deformity,
bony assigns 90604-00 [1578] Correction of bony deformity in the Limb reconstruction block, which does
not appear correct. The body of the operation report describes the exact procedure as an arthrodesis
of the 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint and four osteotomies of separate toes with internal fixation.
What is the correct code assignment?
'Correction of forefoot deformity' is a general description. Coders should be guided by the details
of the procedure documented in the operation report for specific code assignment.
The correct codes to assign for the scenario cited are 49845-00 [1543] Arthrodesis of first metatarsophalangeal
joint and 48403-01 [1528] Osteotomy of toe with internal fixation x 4, following the pathways:
Arthrodesis (with fixation device)
- metatarsophalangeal, 1st 49845-00 [1543]
and
Osteotomy
- toe
- - with internal fixation 48403-01 [1528]
The NCCH will consider improvements to the Alphabetic Index for a future edition of ACHI.
+ Descmets Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK)
What is the correct code for Descmets Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK)?
DSEK is a type of partial thickness keratoplasty.
ACHI does not contain a specific code for partial thickness keratoplasty (including DSEK). The correct
code to assign for this procedure is 90064-00 [173] Other keratoplasty.
+ Food challenges
What is the correct code(s) to assign for a patient admitted for a peanut challenge, who does not
exhibit symptoms of allergy themselves, but is having the challenge because a sibling has a severe peanut
allergy?
There are no guidelines in ICD-10-AM or the ACS for code assignment for patients admitted specifically
for food challenges, and analysis of current coding practice has highlighted inconsistencies.
Patients who are admitted for a food challenge due to a personal history of allergy (where challenge
demonstrates the allergy is no longer present) should be assigned a code from category Z03 Medical observation
and evaluation of suspected diseases and conditions with an additional code Z88.8 >Personal history of
allergy to other drugs, medicaments and biological substances.
For the scenario cited, where there is a family history of food allergy, assign Z03.6 Observation for
suspected toxic effect from ingested substance and Z84.8 Family history of other specified conditions,
following the pathways:
Observation
- suspected (undiagnosed) (unproven)
- - toxic effects from ingested substance (drug) (poison) Z03.6
and
History (of) (personal)
- family, of
- - allergy NEC Z84.8
+ Fracture of hip prosthesis due to trauma
ACS 1309 Dislocation of hip prosthesis states:
'Cases where the patient sustains a traumatic dislocated hip prosthesis should be assigned code S73.0-
Dislocation of hip...'
So an injury code is assigned. Does this ACS also apply to fractures of hip prostheses due to trauma,
ie should an injury code be assigned or is T84.0 Mechanical complication of internal joint prosthesis
the correct code?
The guidelines in ACS 1309 Dislocation of hip prosthesis do apply to fractures of hip prostheses due
to trauma. Appropriate injury and external cause of injury codes should be assigned to reflect the trauma.
T84.0 Mechanical complication of internal joint prosthesis should be assigned where the conditions listed
in T82.0 are specified as due to the joint prosthesis, as per the inclusion term at T84.0 and also following
the criteria in ACS 1309 Dislocation of hip prosthesis.
+ Idiopathic Infantile Arterial Calcification (IIAC)
What is the correct code to assign for idiopathic infantile arterial calcification?
Idiopathic infantile arterial calcification is a rare disorder with diffuse disease of elastic and muscular
arteries. It is characterised by destruction and fragmentation of the arterial internal elastic membrane,
deposition of calcium along the internal elastic membrane and intimal proliferation. The coronary arteries
are most commonly involved and in most cases, death is usually due to congestive heart failure and myocardial
infarction.
There is no specific index entry in ICD-10-AM for idiopathic infantile arterial calcification (IIAC).
The correct code to assign is Q28.8 Other specified congenital malformations of circulatory system.
Improvements to the Alphabetic Index will be considered for this condition for a future edition of ICD-10-AM.
+ Ileocolic resection
When a portion of the ileum is removed along with the caecum the procedure is called an ileocolic
resection. There is no index entry for this procedure, so what code(s) should be assigned?
ACHI does not contain a specific code for ileocolic resection. Assign 30566-00 [895] Resection of small
intestine with anastomosis and 32003-00 [913] Limited excision of large intestine with anastamosis,
to accurately reflect the procedure performed, by following the pathways:
Excision
- intestine
- - small (with anastomosis) 30566-00 [895]
and
Colectomy
- local - see Colectomy, limited
...
- limited (local) (with anastomosis) 32003-00 [913]
If stoma formation is specified in the procedure, select the index entry ?with formation of stoma? in the index pathways above and assign the appropriate codes.
+ Insertion of fiducial markers into the prostate
What is the correct code for insertion of fiducial markers into the prostate?
Fiducial markers are implantable devices used as a tool in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). The markers
may also be called fiducial seeds or gold seed markers. Gold seeds are the most frequently used markers.
The seeds are inserted into the prostate via a needle using transrectal ultrasound. Several days after
insertion of the seeds treatment planning by CT simulation is commenced.
There is currently no specific code in ACHI for insertion of fiducial markers into prostate, therefore assign 90395-00 [1170] Other procedures on prostate.
A specific code for this procedure has been included in ACHI Seventh Edition.
+ Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) treatment
What is the correct code to assign for MARS treatment?
MARS treatment is an extracorporeal, liver support therapy. It is a mechanical detoxification system
designed to selectively eliminate both water-soluble toxins (as in renal dialysis) and strongly albumin-bound
toxins in the blood of patients with liver insufficiency. It supports the liver until it is capable
of spontaneous recovery or it may serve as a bridge to transplantation.
ACHI does not contain a specific code for MARS treatment. Assign 13750-06 [1892] Other therapeutic haemapheresis.
+ Multiple coding of procedures
Should arterial, PICC or CVC lines, MRI and nuclear medicine scans be coded as many times as they
are performed ie multiple times during an admission?
Where arterial, PICC or CVC lines, MRIs or nuclear medicine scans are inserted/performed as stand alone
procedures under an anaesthetic (except local), assign a code as many times as performed, as per the
principles in ACS 0042 Procedures normally not coded.
Where multiple arterial, PICC or CVC lines, MRIs and nuclear medicine scans are performed as stand alone
procedures, but not performed under anaesthetic, or are performed under a local anaesthetic only, assign
a code for the procedure once only.
Where NCCH has not published advice to exempt the coding of specific procedures/interventions multiple times, or they
are not listed in ACS 0042 or ACS 0020, they should be coded as many times as they are performed. For example, thoracentesis,
paracentesis or lumbar punctures should be coded each time they are performed during an episode of care.
See also, 10-AM Commandments Central venous and arterial lines, Vol 15, No 1, June 2008 and advice issued
regarding the coding of multiple CT scans in FAQs, part 2 published in Coding Matters Vol 15, No 3,
Dec 2008 and advice regarding the insertion of Hickman's line in FAQs published in this edition of Coding
Matters, Vol 16, No 2.
These issues have been addressed for the Seventh Edition of ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS.
+ Osteomyelitis of knee due to Burkholderia pseudomallei infection
What is the correct code assignment for osteomyelitis of the knee due to Burkholderia pseudomallei
infection?
Osteomyelitis is an unusual but well recognised manifestation of melioidosis, a disease that is endemic
in South-East Asia and northern Australia. Infection is caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei which can
be acquired by ingestion, inhalation or wound contamination. Infection more commonly occurs in people
with coexistent conditions such as diabetes, renal impairment, chronic pulmonary disease and immunosuppression.
Subacute presentations often mimic other disease processes and patients may not always be clinically
septic.
Treatment for osteomyelitis often requires surgical drainage and multiple antibiotic therapy.
The correct codes to assign for the scenario cited above are M86.86 Other osteomyelitis, lower leg and
B96.88 Other and unspecified bacterial agents as the cause of diseases classified to other chapters,
following the pathways:
Osteomyelitis (infective) (septic) (suppurative)
- specified NEC M86.8-
and
Burkholderia NEC
- pseudomallei (see also Melioidosis)
- - as the cause of disease classified elsewhere B96.88
or
Infection, infected
- Burkholderia NEC
- - pseudomallei (see also Melioidosis)
- - - as the cause of disease classified elsewhere B96.88
+ Procedural complications
What is the correct code to assign for an intraoperative cardiac arrest with successful resuscitation
- I97.8 Other postprocedural disorders of circulatory system, not elsewhere classified or T81.8 Other
complications of procedures, not elsewhere classified?
For a procedural complication occurring during surgical care (as per the above scenario) refer to ACS 1904 Procedural complications which states:
'There are a number of terms used in ICD-10-AM to describe procedural complications and these generally relate to the timing of the complication.
Misadventure
A misadventure is defined as a complication occurring during medical or surgical care. It may be noted at the time of the procedure or after completion of the procedure.'
Then follow the guidelines for classification of procedural complications which states:
'Firstly, check the Alphabetic Index under the main term which best describes the complication, for the subterm of 'procedural' or 'postprocedural'.'
Therefore, for this scenario, follow the index pathway:
Arrest, arrested
- cardiac
- - postprocedural I97.8
and assign I97.8 Other postprocedural disorders of circulatory system, not elsewhere classified with I46.0 Cardiac arrest with successful resuscitation to provide further specification of the condition (as per ACS 1904) and the appropriate external cause of injury codes.
Do not follow the index pathway Arrest, cardiac, complicating, surgery and assign T81.8 as this is contrary to the guidelines in ACS 1904.
Improvements to the Alphabetic Index in relation to procedural complications will be considered for a future edition of ICD-10-AM
+ Radiofrequency ablation of stellate ganglion
What is the correct code to assign for radiofrequency ablation of stellate ganglion?
The correct code to assign for radiofrequency ablation of the stellate ganglion is 39323-00 [72] Other
percutaneous neurotomy by radiofrequency by following the pathway:
Ablation
- nerve - see also neurotomy
Neurotomy
- peripheral
- - percutaneous, by
- - - radiofrequency 39323-00 [72]
Improvements to the ACHI Alphabetic Index for this procedure will be considered for a future edition.
+ Use of abbreviations and symbols
When can coders use abbreviations and symbols documented in the clinical record to assign conditions, eg
↓ Hb or Hb 98 documented and transfusion given - can anaemia be assigned?
↓ K or K2.9 documented and potassium supplements commenced - can hypokalaemia be assigned?
Clinicians sometimes use abbreviations and symbols to document conditions in the clinical record. Each
case should be assessed on its own merits to determine if the documentation sufficiently describes a
condition that meets the criteria in ACS 0001 Principal diagnosis or ACS 0002 Additional diagnoses,
in order to be coded.
When ↓Hb or ↓K is documented as the indication for an intervention such as a blood transfusion or commencement
of medication, a code for the condition can be assigned if the test result or clinician confirms that
the patient's haemoglobin or potassium is below the normal range; as the criteria for code assignment
in ACS 0001 or ACS 0002 has been met. See ACS 0010 General abstraction guidelines.
So, where ↓Hb is documented as the indication for a transfusion and the test results and/or clinician
verifies the patient's haemoglobin is below the normal range - follow the index pathway, Low, haemoglobin
and assign D64.9 Anaemia, unspecified.
Where ↓ K is documented as the indication for commencement of medication and the test results and/or
clinician verifies the patient's potassium is below the normal range, follow the index pathway Deficiency,
potassium (K); Depletion, potassium; Hypokalaemia; or Hypopotassaemia and assign E87.6 Hypokalaemia.
However, if ICD-10-AM does not provide an index look up or there is uncertainty or ambiguity in relation
to such abbreviated forms of documentation, they should be confirmed with the clinician prior to code
assignment. Coders should not assign codes on the basis of test results alone.
+ Bibliography
Fuller, C.F & Scarbrough T.J, Fiducial Markers in Image-guided Radiotherapy of the Prostate. Accessed
20 August 2009. http://www.touchoncology.com/files/article_pdfs/onco_6729
Nandurkar, D & Lau, K, Melioidosis as a Cause of Multifocal Osteomyelitis, Clinical Nuclear Medicine,
Volume 31(1), January 2006, pp 25-27. Accessed 15 July 2009.
http://journals.lww.com/nuclearmed/Abstract/2006/01000/Melioidosis_as_a_Cause_of_Multifocal_Osteomyelitis.9.aspx
Novelli, G, Rossi, M, Ferretti, G, Nudo, F, Bussotti, G, Mennini, L, Ferretti, S, Antonellis, S, Martelli,
S, Berloco, P.B, Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System Treatment for Acute Hepatic Failure in Patients
with Hepatitis B Undergoing Chemotherapy for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Transplant Proceedings, Volume
37, Issue 6, July-August 2005, Pages 2560-2562. Accessed 20 August 2009.
http://www.sciencedirect.com
Popoff, I, Nagamori, J & Currie, B, Melioidotic Osteomyelitis in Northern Australia, ANZ Journal of
Surgery, Volume 67, Issue 10 (p 692-695). Published Online 21 January 2008. Accessed 15 July 2009. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119163131/PDFSTART
The Fetus Net, Aortic calcinosis. Accessed 21 August 2009.
http://www.thefetus.net/page.php?id=1178
The Free Dictionary, BK Virus. Accessed 21 August 2009.
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/BK+virus
WrongDiagnosis.com, BK Virus Infection. Accessed 21 August 2009.
http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/b/bk_virus_infection/intro.htm
+ FAQ's
The following FAQs were asked at the recent ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS Sixth Edition 2009 continuing education
coding workshops. The standard abbreviation of 'ACS' has been used throughout for 'Australian Coding
Standard'.
As many of the FAQs raised at the workshops were case specific, it is recommended that coders review
these answers with the workbook to help understand the context of the responses.
The workshop books are still available for purchase for those who couldn't attend a workshop, please
refer to our website: http://www.fhs.usyd.edu.au/ncch
and follow the link to the 2009 Coding workshops (ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS Sixth Edition)
+ Q1:
Q1: In case scenario 3 the patient was admitted for insertion of a biventricular pacemaker due to
CCF. Why was a code assigned for the haematoma, isn't this complication considered an expected outcome
of this type of surgery?
A: In this case scenario the patient developed a wound haematoma at the pocket site where the generator
for the pacemaker was inserted as indicated by the following documentation:
Haematoma noted at 1700 hours post IPPM. 10 minutes of manual pressure applied over site. Site was
initially marked at 1700 hours and monitored with no increase in haematoma size since then. Seen by
doctor and a pressure bandage was applied at 1800 hours. Information regarding the PPM was given to
the patient and she was discharged at 1830 hours
.
Where a catheter is inserted through the femoral vein, a haematoma at the puncture site is quite common.
These haematomas usually resolve. However, in this case the haematoma was monitored by the nursing staff
and then reviewed by the clinician to assess the size of the haematoma and apply a pressure bandage
etc. Therefore, it meets the criteria in ACS 0002 and the following codes were assigned:
T82.8 Other complications of cardiac and vascular prosthetic devices, implants and grafts
Y83.1 Surgical operation with implant of artificial internal device
Y92.22 Place of occurrence, health service area
+ Q2:
Q2: If a patient is admitted for insertion of a biventricular pacemaker and following the procedure
develops a wound haematoma, can an additional code be assigned for contusion of thorax?
A: Yes, S20.2 Contusion of thorax can be assigned as an additional code to further specify the
type of complication as per ACS 1904, 'An additional code from Chapters 1 to 19 may be assigned to
provide further specification of the condition.'
+ Q3:
Q3: If an intraoperative haemorrhage occurs during, for example the insertion of a pacemaker as
seen in case scenario 3, which is the correct code to assign T81.0 Haemorrhage and haematoma complicating
a procedure, not elsewhere classified or T82.8 Other complications of cardiac and vascular prosthetic
devices, implants and grafts?
A: Follow the excludes note at T81.0 Haemorrhage and haematoma complicating a procedure, not elsewhere
classified and assign the most appropriate code:
T81.0 Haemorrhage and haematoma complicating a procedure, not elsewhere classified
Haemorrhage at any site resulting from a procedure
Excludes:
haematoma of obstetric wound (O90.2)
haemorrhage due to or associated with prosthetic
devices, implants and grafts (T82.8, T83.8,
T84.8, T85.8)
'associated with' was added to the excludes note in Sixth Edition at T81.0 as there doesn't need to
be a cause and effect relationship between the device, implant or graft and the haemorrhage for T82.8
to be assigned.
+ Q4:
Q4: Why was I25.2 Old myocardial infarction and Z95.5 Presence of coronary angioplasty implant and
graft assigned in case scenario 3?
A: In this case scenario there is documentation that the patient was admitted for insertion of a biventricular
pacemaker due to CCF 'on a history of recurrent MI, ... history of stenting of RCA and LAD four years previously'.
Codes have been assigned for these conditions, as per ACS 0940 Ischaemic heart disease - Old myocardial
infarct (I25.2) and Chronic ischaemic heart disease (I25.9) and ACS 2112 Personal history,
because the history of old myocardial infarct and coronary implant status is documented as being directly
relevant to the current episode of care (or is linked to the condition currently being treated).
+ Q5:
Q5: In case scenario 4:
Principal diagnosis
Bradycardia
History
ESRD secondary to CKD
Hypertension
Mitral regurgitation
Gout
Patient was transferred from another hospital dialysis centre on 11/8 for investigation and management
of chest pain and bradycardia. He was noted to have chest pain while receiving dialysis and his heart
rate was 40bpm. Following transfer he was still experiencing some dizziness and chest pain which was
eventually relieved by GTN?
Why was chest pain coded and should it have been the principal diagnosis?
A: R07.4 Chest pain, unspecified was coded as an additional diagnosis as it met the criteria in ACS
0002 Additional diagnoses - the condition was a problem on admission and it was treated with GTN.
In selecting a condition as the principal diagnosis ACS 0001 Principal diagnosis should be followed.
Within this ACS guidelines are provided for when 'two or more conditions, each potentially meeting the
definition for principal diagnosis' occurs and the clinician should be asked to indicate which diagnosis
best meets the principal diagnosis definition. In this scenario the bradycardia and chest pain both
could have equally met the definition of principal diagnosis however the clinician has then indicated
that the principal diagnosis was bradycardia.
+ Q6:
Q6: In case scenario 4 an ECG was performed which 'showed no acute changes, however, ventricular
bigeminy was noted'. Should a code for ventricular bigeminy be assigned?
A: 'Ventricular bigeminy refers to alternating normal sinus and premature ventricular complexes. Three
or more successive premature ventricular complexes are arbitrarily defined as ventricular tachycardia.
Premature ventricular complexes become more prevalent with increasing age and occur in association with
a variety of stimuli. It is important to determine whether underlying structural heart disease is present
and left ventricular function is impaired. Other common causes include electrolyte abnormalities, stimulants,
and some medications.' (http://www.aafp.org/afp/20020615/2491.html - Journal of the American Academy
of Family Physicians)
Ventricular bigeminy noted on the ECG is not coded as per ACS 0010 General abstraction guidelines -
Test results. The clinician has not indicated a relationship between this finding and a condition OR
indicated its significance.
+ Q7:
Q7: Why was fluid overload coded in case scenario 5 when it is a symptom of chronic kidney disease?
A: In this scenario the patient was initially admitted for investigation of acute on chronic renal failure
however the focus of the admission was the management of fluid overload. As per ACS 0002 Additional diagnoses
- Problems and underlying conditions:
'If a problem with a known underlying cause is being treated, then both conditions should be coded (see
also ACS 0001 Principal diagnosis, Problems and underlying conditions). '
Therefore in this case scenario a code has been assigned for fluid overload (E87.7) as it was documented
that the condition did not improve after 10 days treatment.
+ Q8:
Q8: If a patient with acute on chronic kidney disease is transferred to another hospital within
24-48 hrs of admission what code is assigned for the chronic component of the disease?
A: As per Coding Matters (FAQs) Vol 15, No 2, September 2008:
'In this scenario assign N18.9 Chronic kidney disease, unspecifiedfor the chronic component of
the disease as the eGFR will not be a true indicator of the underlying level of kidney function. However
if 'end-stage' is documented or the patient is on ongoing haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis then
N18.5 Chronic kidney disease, stage 5 would be assigned.'
+ Q9:
Q9: When should Z91.1 Personal history of noncompliance with medical treatment be assigned?
A: ACS 0517 Noncompliance with treatment provides the following guidelines:
'Z91.1 Personal history of noncompliance with medical treatment and regimen should be used where
noncompliance is a precipitating factor in an admission. It should not be used as a principal diagnosis.'
These guidelines were developed specifically for the coding of mental health episodes of care where
noncompliance with medication commonly exacerbates the patient's condition, resulting in their admission
to hospital. This code may also be assigned in other circumstances if it meets the criteria in ACS 0002
Additional diagnoses. ACS 0517 will be reviewed for a future edition.
+ Q10:
Q10: Why wasn't the Hickman's line insertion coded in case scenario 6?
A: Insertion of the Hickman's catheter was not assigned in this case scenario as it was the route of
administration for the haemodialysis. As per ACS 0042 Procedures normally not coded:
'These procedures are normally not coded because they are usually routine in nature, performed for most
patients and/or can occur multiple times during an episode. Most importantly, the resources used to
perform these procedures are often reflected in the diagnosis or in an associated procedure. That is,
for a particular diagnosis or procedure there is a standard treatment which is unnecessary to code.'
Changes are being made to this area of the classification for Seventh Edition to provide specific guidance
on the coding of IV lines and catheters. See also advice in 10-AM Commandments - Multiple coding of
procedures, published in Coding Matters Vol 16, No 2, September 2009.
+ Q11:
Q11: What is the principal diagnosis if a patient is admitted with multiple microvascular complications
of their diabetes?
A: Refer to ACS 0401 Diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation - Diabetes with multiple microvascular
and other specified nonvascular complications. The following coding principles can assist in
code assignment:
- Only assign E1-.71 as the principal diagnosis when no one microvascular complication is the focus
of the admission
- If, for example, the nephropathy complication is the focus of the admission assign as the principal
diagnosis E1-.2- followed by the chapter specific code as appropriate. E1-.71 is then assigned as an
additional diagnosis together with any other specific complication codes as appropriate to indicate
the patient has multiple microvascular complications.
+ Q12:
Q12: Could you please clarify the coding of excision of skin lesions in point 5 of ACS 0020 Bilateral/multiple procedures?
For example, if a patient is admitted for excision of a BCC on the forearm and a compound naevus on the breast and both are excised during the same visit to theatre, what code(s) would be assigned?
A: ACS 0020 Bilateral/multiple procedures has the following sections:
Bilateral procedures
- Procedures with a bilateral code
- Inherently bilateral procedures
- Procedures with no code option for bilateral
Multiple procedures
- The SAME PROCEDURE repeated during the episode of care at different visits to theatre
- The SAME PROCEDURE repeated during a visit to theatre involving ONE ENTRY POINT/APPROACH and similar/same lesions
- The SAME PROCEDURE repeated during a visit to theatre involving ONE ENTRY POINT/APPROACH and different lesions
- The SAME PROCEDURE repeated during a visit to theatre involving MORE THAN ONE ENTRY POINT/APPROACH and more than one non-bilateral site
- Skin or subcutaneous lesion removal
Point 5 - Skin or subcutaneous lesion removal - Assign the relevant code for excision of multiple lesions. In the scenario cited, two lesions have been removed from different sites, ACHI assigns the same code for these two sites therefore assign 31205-00 [1620] Excision of lesion(s) of skin and subcutaneous tissue of other site once only, as per the following index pathway:
Excision - see also Removal
- lesion(s) - see also Excision, tumour and Excision, cyst and Excision, polyp
- - skin and subcutaneous tissue
- - - specified site NEC 31205-00 [1620]
- - - - ankle 31235-04 [1620]
- - - - calf 31235-03 [1620]
- - - - cheek 31235-00 [1620]
- - - - ear 31230-02 [1620]
- - - - - wedge 45665-02 [1663]
- - - - eyelid 31230-00 [1620]
- - - - - wedge 45665-01 [1662]
- - - - finger 31230-04 [1620]
- - - - foot 31235-04 [1620]
- - - - forehead 31235-00 [1620]
- - - - genitals 31230-05 [1620]
- - - - hand 31235-02 [1620]
- - - - head NEC 31235-00 [1620]
- - - - hip 31235-03 [1620]
- - - - knee 31235-03 [1620]
- - - - leg 31235-03 [1620]
- - - - lip (see also Excision, lesion(s), lip) 31230-03 [1620]
- - - - - wedge 45665-00 [1664]
- - - - neck 31235-01 [1620]
- - - - nose 31230-01 [1620]
- - - - penis 31230-05 [1620]
- - - - pre and postauricular region 31235-00 [1620]
- - - - scrotum 31230-05 [1620]
- - - - thigh 31235-03 [1620]
- - - - thumb 31230-04 [1620]
- - - - toe 31235-04 [1620]
- - - - vulva 31230-05 [1620]
- - - - wrist 31235-02 [1620]
The following examples can assist in code assignment:
- single or multiple forehead skin sites eg assign 31235-00 [1620] once only
- lesion(s) removed from hip, thigh and knee assign 31235-03 [1620] once only as ACHI provides the same code for these sites
- lesion(s) removed from hand and foot assign 31235-02 [1620] and 31235-04 [1620] as ACHI provides a separate code for each site.
+ Q13:
Q13: In case scenario 7 why was the revision of the burns scar coded 8 times when the procedure
was only performed on both the left and right leg, therefore shouldn't this procedure have only been
coded twice?
A: As per ACS 0020 Bilateral/multiple procedures - Multiple procedures point 4 - the same procedure
repeated during a visit to theatre involving more than one entry point/approach and more than one non-bilateral
site.
'Assign a code for each procedure as there is a separate entry point/approach for each one.'
In this case a total of 8 revisions of the burn scars were performed, 6 on the right leg and 2 on the
left with separate entry points for each, therefore a total of 8 procedures were performed. Laterality
doesn't apply to skin as the skin is considered one organ therefore the reference to left and right
leg is irrelevant and point 4 is followed.
+ Q14:
Q14: What is the difference between:
O72.0 Third-stage haemorrhage
O72.2 Delayed and secondary postpartum haemorrhage and
O73.0 Retained placenta without haemorrhage
O73.1 Retained portions of placenta and membranes, without haemorrhage?
A: The difference between these two groups of codes is that the term 'without haemorrhage' has to be documented before assigning O73.0 or O73.1 as per the following index pathway where 'without haemorrhage' is an essential modifier:
Retention, retained
- placenta (total) (with haemorrhage) O72.0
- - without haemorrhage O73.0
- - portions or fragments (with haemorrhage) O72.2
- - - without haemorrhage O73.1
ICD-10-AM defaults to 'with haemorrhage' unless 'without' is clearly documented.
+ Q15:
Q15: The term 'pre-existing' is used in the code titles for O99.02 Anaemia complicating pregnancy,
with mention of pre-existing anaemia and O99.04 Anaemia complicating childbirth and the puerperium,
with mention of pre-existing anaemia, what does the term 'pre-existing' mean?
A: In ICD-10-AM 'pre-existing anaemia' refers to an anaemia which exists prior to the current pregnancy.
A note defining 'pre-existing anaemia' will be included in the Tabular List in a future edition.
+ Q16:
Q16: Can Z35.51 Supervision of primigravida with advanced maternal age be assigned as an
additional code in case scenario 8 where 'a 37 y.o. primigravida' was documented?
A: No, this code should not be assigned based on documentation of age alone. When only the age of the
patient is documented (?35 years) without any qualifying statements to indicate that the age of the
patient has had an impact on the patient's care this code should not be assigned as per ACS 0002 Additional
diagnoses and ACS 1524 Advanced maternal age.
+ Q17:
Q17: Can a code from category O42 Premature rupture of membranes be assigned from the times
documented on the partogram for when labour was established?
A: No, a code from this category should not be assigned based on documentation of the times for the
establishment of labour alone. Therefore 'premature rupture of membranes' must be documented and must
meet the criteria in either ACS 0001 Principal diagnosis, ACS 0002 Additional diagnoses or ACS
1531 Premature rupture of membranes before it can be coded.
+ Q18:
Q18: In case scenario 9 a patient was admitted following a multi vehicle collision with suspected
C6/7 paraplegia, test results revealed:
MRI - central cord contusion and defect at C6/7 CT (with contrast) - diffuse lesion at C6/7, no
displacement of cord.
As central cord syndrome has not been documented should S14.10 Injury of cervical spinal cord,
unspecified be assigned instead of S14.12 Central cord syndrome (incomplete cord injury) of cervical
spinal cord?
A: Central cord syndrome (CCS) is an acute incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). This syndrome,
usually the result of trauma, is associated with damage to the large nerve fibres that carry information
directly from the cerebral cortex to the spinal cord. The segment of spinal cord affected by central
cord syndrome is the cervical segment, the part of the spinal cord that is encased within the first
seven vertebrae, running from the base of the brain and into the neck.The cord syndromes describe the
area (almost cross sectionally) of the spinal cord that has been affected by the lesion (ie contusion/haemorrhage
etc). A common cause of this type of injury includes trauma.
Any injury or condition that preferentially damages the central, grey matter of the cervical spinal
cord can lead to central cord syndrome. The most common causes include complications of the progressive,
degenerative spinal disease called spondylosis, as well as traumatic injury to the cervical spine, such
as fractures or dislocations. The diagram below illustrates the location of the injury to the spinal
cord.
Central cord lesion/contusion/injury are all synonymous terms that describe a central cord syndrome
and an MRI can show direct evidence of spinal cord impingement from bone, disc, or haematoma - therefore
S14.12 is the most appropriate code to assign in this case. A central cord contusion can be assumed
to be central cord syndrome as any injury of the central cord is effectively a central cord syndrome.
The indexing of this condition will be reviewed for a future edition.
http://www.answers.com/topic/central-cord-syndrome
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/central_cord/central_cord.htm
http://www.healthline.com/galecontent/central-cord-syndrome
http://www.neurosurgerytoday.org/what/patient_e/central_cord_syndrome_06.asp
+ Q19:
Q19: Does there need to be a causal link between jaundice and prematurity for P59.0 Neonatal
jaundice associated with preterm delivery to be assigned?
A: No, the index indicates that the jaundice can be 'due to or associated with' preterm delivery.
+ Q20:
Q20: Does sedation need to be coded with ventilation when it is administered?
A: As per ACS 0031 Anaesthesia, a code is assigned for any form of anaesthetic except local anaesthesia
and oral sedation, when administered for anaesthetic purposes to perform a procedure ie for intubation/ventilation.
+ Q21:
Q21: In clinical record 2 the acute renal failure was documented as being due to dehydration and
medications. Should N17.8 Other acute kidney failure be assigned?
A: There is a 'specified NEC' pathway in the index under Failure, kidney, acute. However, when
checking the Tabular List we can see that the axis at the fourth character level specifies the type
and site of necrosis rather than specifying the cause of the renal failure. The appropriate code to
assign in this case is, therefore, N17.9 Acute kidney failure, unspecified.
+ Q22:
Q22: Should patient controlled analgesia (PCAs) be coded as per the hierarchy in ACS 0031 Anaesthesia - Classification point 5?
A: Codes for PCAs in Fifth Edition were only assigned if 'data was required at the local hospital level'. This entry was removed from ACS 0031 in Sixth Edition to reinforce coding consistency at a national level. However no changes were made to the hierarchy of codes in the ACS:
[1912] Postprocedural analgesia
- Management of neuraxial block (92516-00)
- Management of regional block (codes 92517-00, 92517-01, 92517-02, 92517-03)
- Subcutaneous postprocedural analgesic infusion (90030-00)
- Intravenous postprocedural infusion, patient controlled analgesia (PCA) (92518-00)
- Intravenous postprocedural analgesic infusion (92518-01)
Subcutaneous and intravenous postprocedural analgesic infusions should not be coded and ACS 0031 will be amended in Seventh Edition to reflect this advice with points iii-v being deleted in the above hierarchy of codes.
+ Q23:
Q23: Why was bradycardia in clinical record 5 coded as a procedural complication and assigned a misadventure code for the external cause?
A: In this record bradycardia was coded as a procedural complication following clinical advice which indicated that bradycardia was related to the procedure being performed:
'During an endoscopy a patient can become ?vagal? due to the stimulation of the bowel, this produces bradycardia which sometimes may need to be treated with a vagal blocker like atropine. This is considered an effect of having the procedure and therefore can be caused by the endoscopy.'
Therefore, as per ACS 1904 Procedural complications, bradycardia meets the definition of a procedural complication:
A condition or injury which is directly related to a surgical/procedural intervention.
Although the bradycardia is not documented as being 'due to' the procedure it was 'related' to the procedure as per the definition above. There is documentation on the discharge summary that the patient developed bradycardia intraoperatively and the operation report indicated that the procedure was 'limited' because of this condition.
Once this definition is met follow the classification guidelines for the coding of a symptom:
Symptoms which meet the criteria of procedural complications
When a procedural complication is a symptom classifiable to Chapter 18 Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified, assign an appropriate chapter specific 'postprocedural disorder' code, followed by the code for the symptom and the appropriate external cause codes.
and assign:
I97.8 Other postprocedural disorders of the circulatory system, not elsewhere classified
R00.1 Bradycardia, unspecified
As bradycardia occurred intraoperatively it meets the criteria for a misadventure as per the following definition in ACS 1904:
'Misadventure
A misadventure is defined as a complication occurring during medical or surgical care. It may be noted at the time of the procedure or after completion of the procedure.
From the documentation we know the complication occurred intraoperatively and the external cause code then identifies the timing of the complication. Assign Y65.8 Other specified misadventures during surgical and medical care as per the following classification guidelines:
Misadventure
A code from block Y60-Y69 Misadventures to patients during surgical and medical care should be assigned when the complication occurs during a procedure.
Refer to the main term of 'Misadventure' in the ICD-10-AM Index to External Causes of Injury, and then by the type of misadventure.'
Improvements to the Alphabetic Index are being considered for a future edition.
+ Q24:
Q24: In clinical record 5 why was diverticulosis assigned as the principal diagnosis given the patient
was being admitted for investigation of anaemia and melaena as per ACS 0046 Diagnosis selection for same-day
endoscopy?
A: In this case a discharge summary was completed by the clinician which indicated the principal diagnosis
was sigmoid diverticulosis. The intent of ACS 0046 is to provide guidelines to coders for the coding
of same-day cases where a number of conditions may meet the definition of principal diagnosis and no
guidance is provided by the clinician. However, this case provides a discharge summary which clearly
indicates the principal diagnosis.
Additional codes were assigned for the anaemia and melaena (refer to ACS 1102 Gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage)
and as the contact bleeding (transverse colon) occurred at a different site to the diverticulosis
(sigmoid colon) no link has been made between these two conditions.
+ Q25:
Q25: Why was a short colonoscopy coded in clinical record 5?
A: The operation report in this record indicated that the colonoscopy was only able to be passed to
the transverse colon, therefore 32084-00 [905] Fibreoptic colonoscopy to hepatic flexure is the
correct code to assign. A long colonoscopy goes beyond the hepatic flexure as per the index pathway
in ACHI:
Colonoscopy (beyond hepatic flexure) (fibreoptic) (long) (to caecum) 32090-00 [905]
...
- to hepatic flexure (short) 32084-00 [905]
The following diagram illustrates the anatomy of the colon and where a short and long colonoscopy passes
to:
+ Q26:
Q26: Why was Z06.99 Agent resistant to other single specified antibiotic assigned in clinical
record 6?
A: There was documentation on the discharge summary and in the progress notes that the E. coli
(found on MSU) was resistant to Keflex. ACS 0112 Infection with drug resistant microorganisms
indicates that:
'If the clinician has documented in the record that the organism causing the infection is resistant
to an antibiotic, then the appropriate code from Z06.- Bacterial agents resistant to antibiotics
must also be assigned.
A code from category Z06.- Bacterial agents resistant to antibiotics is assigned as an additional
code to identify the antibiotic to which a bacterial agent is resistant.'
It should be noted that a code from this category should not be assigned based on microbiology sensitivity
results alone.
+ Q27:
Q27: Why was I25.9 Chronic ischaemic heart disease, unspecified assigned in clinical record
6, wouldn't I25.2 Old myocardial infarction be more specific?
A: In this record IHD was noted on the discharge summary as one of the associated conditions for the
episode of care. During the admission an echocardiogram was performed and the indication for this intervention
was IHD, therefore this condition meets ACS 0002 for code assignment.
ACS 0940 Ischaemic heart disease provides guidelines on the assignment of I25.9. As this record
does not provide any additional information in the current episode of care and there is no access to
previous admission notes which could indicate the specificity of the IHD (ie coronary atherosclerosis
I25.1-), I25.9 is assigned.
I25.2 Old myocardial infarction would not be assigned as the condition does not meet the classification
guidelines in ACS 0940:
I25.2 Old myocardial infarction is essentially a 'history of' code, even though it is not included
in the Z code chapter. It should be assigned as an additional code only if all of the following criteria
apply:
- the 'old' myocardial infarction occurred more than four weeks (28 days) ago;
- the patient is currently not receiving care (observation, evaluation or treatment) for their 'old'
myocardial infarction; and
- the 'old' myocardial infarction meets the criteria in ACS 2112 Personal history.
+ Combination drug coding
How should poisoning/adverse effect due to combination drugs be coded? For example, Mersyndol, which
is a combination of 3 drugs; codeine, paracetamol and doxylamine succinate.
If a combination drug is documented as the cause of a poisoning/adverse effect - and no individual component
is identified as being responsible for the poisoning/adverse effect, assign a code for each of the components.
Example 1: Patient admitted with poisoning by Mersyndol (codeine, paracetamol and
doxylamine succinate). No individual component of the Mersyndol was identified as the cause of the poisoning.
Table of Drugs and Chemicals:
Codeine...T40.2
Doxylamine...T45.0
Paracetamol...T39.1
Assign:
T40.2 (Poisoning by) Other opioids
T45.0 (Poisoning by) Antiallergic and antiemetic drugs
T39.1 (Poisoning by) 4-Aminophenol derivatives
With a code for any significant manifestation that meets the criteria in ACS 0002 Additional diagnoses,
plus appropriate external cause, place of occurrence and activity codes.
If a combination drug is documented as the cause of a poisoning/adverse effect - and one of the components
is identified as causing the poisoning/adverse effect, assign a code for that drug only. Code(s) for
the other components of the combination drug are not required.
Example 2: Patient admitted with bronchospasm due to ingestion of Mersyndol (codeine,
paracetamol and doxylamine succinate) - taken as directed on the packet, for menstrual cramps. The codeine
was documented as the cause of the bronchospasm.
Table of Drugs and Chemicals:
Codeine...Y45.0
Assign:
J98.0 Diseases of bronchus, not elsewhere classified
Y45.0 (Drugs ...causing adverse effects in therapeutic use) Opioids and related analgesics
With appropriate place of occurrence code.
See also ACS 1901 Poisoning and ACS 1902 Adverse effects.
+ Complications of surgical and medical care
a. Headache due to anaesthesia
How do you code headache due to anaesthesia (other than spinal and epidural anaesthesia)?
To code headache due to anaesthetic drugs or anaesthesia in ICD-10-AM Sixth Edition, follow the guidelines
in ACS 1904 Procedural complications and ACS 1902 Adverse effects, Drugs.
For headache due to anaesthetic drugs, follow the index pathway:
Headache
- drug induced NEC G44.4
and assign G44.4 Drug-induced headache, not elsewhere classified with an external cause code to identify the drug.
If the headache is specified as due to anaesthesia, but not specifically the anaesthetic drugs, follow the index pathway:
Complications
- anaesthesia, anaesthetic NEC (see also Anaesthesia, complication or reaction NEC) T88.5
and assign T88.5 Other complications of anaesthesia with R51 Headache as an additional diagnosis to complete the clinical picture.
b. Leaking gastrostomy tube
What is the correct code assignment for leaking gastrostomy tube?
To assign a code for leaking gastrostomy tube follow the guidelines in ACS 1904 Procedural complications:
"Firstly, check the Alphabetic Index under the main term which best describes the complication, for
the subterm of 'procedural' or 'postprocedural'...
In some cases, rather than the generic term 'postprocedural', the subterm may directly describe the
procedure involved."
Therefore, the correct code to assign is T85.5 Mechanical complication of gastrointestinal prosthetic
devices, implants and grafts by following the index pathway:
Leak, leakage
- device, implant or graft
- - gastrointestinal (bile duct) (oesophagus) T85.5
with Y83.3 Surgical operation with formation of external stoma and Y92.22 Health service area.
c. Postprocedural bile leak
What is the correct code assignment for postprocedural bile leak?
When postprocedural/anastomotic bile leakage is documented but trauma or mechanical complication (conditions
listed in T82.0) due to gastrointestinal implant is not specified, assign K91.8 Other postprocedural
disorders of the digestive system, not elsewhere classified, following the index pathway:
Complication
- digestive
- - postprocedural
- - - specified NEC K91.8
K83.8 Other specified diseases of biliary tract may be assigned as an additional code to specify the
site of the postprocedural/anastomotic bile leak.
Where there is documentation that the postprocedural/anastomotic bile leak is due to trauma or mechanical
complication (conditions listed in T82.0), assign the appropriate codes from Chapter 19 Injury, Poisoning
and Certain Other Consequences of External Causes (S00-T98) as per the guidelines in ACS 1904 Procedural
complications. For example, for a postprocedural/anastomotic bile leak due to:
- operative trauma - assign T81.2 Accidental puncture and laceration during a procedure, not elsewhere classified with the appropriate injury code (S code) to identify the site of the trauma.
- mechanical complication (conditions listed in T82.0) due to a gastrointestinal implant - assign T85.5 Mechanical complication of gastrointestinal prosthetic devices, implants and grafts.
In addition, assign external cause of injury and place of occurrence codes as appropriate
+ Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap for breast reconstruction
What is the correct code to assign for a DIEP flap for breast reconstruction?
The correct code to assign for a DIEP flap for breast reconstruction is 45530-00 [1756] Reconstruction
of breast using myocutaneous flap. Even though a DIEP flap does not use myocutaneous tissue, myocutaneous
is a nonessential modifier in the Alphabetic Index, despite being specified in the code title.
The NCCH will review the code title of 45530-00 [1756] for a future edition of ACHI.
+ Duodenoscope assisted cholangiopancreatoscopy (DACP)
What is the correct procedure code to assign for duodenoscope assisted cholangiopancreatoscopy?
Duodenoscope assisted cholangiopancreatoscopy (DACP) allows direct visualisation of the biliary and
pancreatic ducts. It is beneficial in circumstances where direct ductal visualisation is helpful in
clarifying a diagnosis or providing targeted treatment that is not possible with conventional fluoroscopic
imaging.
The procedure was first described in the mid-1970s when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatoscopy
(ERCP) was in its infancy. The procedure involves a small calibre cholangiopancreatoscope (daughter
scope or baby scope) being passed through the accessory channel of the duodenoscope and is used to cannulate
the ampulla of Vater and obtain images of the bile duct and then the pancreatic duct.
The technique, however, was not widely accepted due to expensive and inadequate instruments which suffered
frequent breakage, poor optics, etc.
However, in recent years technological improvements have overcome the inadequate equipment of the past
and DACP may expand management options for pancreaticobiliary disorders in the future.
The correct code assignment for DACP is:
30442-00 [957] Choledochoscopy
and
30473-00 [1005] Panendoscopy to duodenum
+ Elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA)
What is the correct principal diagnosis selection for a day stay urology admission where 'elevated PSA'
alone is documented as the principal diagnosis on the discharge summary and as the indication on the
operation report but where the histopathology report received after discharge indicates adenocarcinoma?
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a protein that is secreted into ejaculate which helps to nourish
the sperm. Normally, only tiny amounts enter the bloodstream. However, cancer cells and other conditions
can interfere with proper functioning and cause large amounts to enter the blood. It is currently the
most widely used method to screen for prostate cancer.
It is acknowledged that elevated PSA is also an indicator of other conditions
such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), urinary tract infections and prostatitis. For the scenario
cited, where histopathology has confirmed a diagnosis of adenoacarcinoma, this should be assigned as
the principal diagnosis. The adenoacarcinoma should be coded as a finding that adds specificity to the
diagnosis of 'elevated PSA' as per the guidelines in ACS 0010 General abstraction guidelines,test results.
Clinical advice has confirmed that R79.8 Other specified abnormal findings of blood chemistry is the
correct code to assign for elevated PSA.
+ Excisional debridement
Should an additional code for suture of wound be assigned with 30023-01 [1566] Excisional debridement
of soft tissue involving bone or cartilage as it does not contain an includes note for suture of wound
as in 30023-00 [1566] Excisional debridement of soft tissue
30023-00 [1566] Excisional debridement of soft tissue has the following note:
'Includes: suture of wound'
This has led some coders to assume that as there is no similar note at 30023-01 [1566] Excisional debridement
of soft tissue involving bone or cartilage, that any suture of the wound should be assigned as an additional
code for this procedure as it does not contain the same includes note.
However, in these circumstances the guidelines in ACS 0016 General Procedure Guidelines - Procedure
Components apply and it is unnecessary to assign an additional code for suture of wound performed with
excisional debridement. It is a component of the procedure.
The 'includes' note at 30023-00 [1566] will be reviewed for a future edition of ACHI.
+ Fall while water skiing
What is the correct external cause code to assign for fall causing injury (other than drowning/submersion injury) while water skiing?
The correct external cause code to assign for fall from water skis causing injury (other than drowning/submersion
injury) is W02.2 Fall involving water ski following the index pathway:
Fall, falling (accidental)
- involving
- - conveyance, pedestrian
- - - not in collision with pedestrian
- - - - ski(s)
- - - - - water W02.2
Water ski accidents may be classified as a pedestrian conveyance or water craft accident depending on
the circumstances of the accident. However, clinical advice from the National Injury Surveillance Unit
(NISU) confirmed that W02.2 Fall involving water ski describes this accident more specifically than
the residual code V94.7 Other and unspecified water transport accidents, water skis and should, therefore,
be assigned in this instance.
+ Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in pregnancy
Should a code from Chapter 15 Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Puerperium be assigned in addition to
a code for human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] disease (B20-B24) for HIV complicating pregnancy, delivery
or the puerperium?
There is no index entry specifically for HIV complicating pregnancy and there is an exclusion note for
'human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] disease (B20-B24)' at O98 Maternal infectious and parasitic diseases
classifiable elsewhere but complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium. Therefore, it is unnecessary
to assign a code from Chapter 15 Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Puerperium in addition to a code from
B20-B24 for HIV complicating pregnancy, childbirth or the puerperium.
Z33 Pregnant state, incidental may be assigned as an additional code for episodes of care where a patient
is admitted for HIV and is pregnant as per the advice in ACS 1521Conditions complicating pregnancy, Incidental pregnant state.
+ Incontinence
Please clarify ACS 1808 Incontinence below in relation to the following:
1808 INCONTINENCE
Incontinence is clinically significant when the incontinence:
- is not clinically considered to be physiologically normal,
- is not clinically considered to be developmentally normal, or
- is persistent in a patient with significant disability or mental retardation.
Urinary and faecal incontinence codes (R32 Unspecified urinary incontinence, R15 Faecal incontinence)
should be assigned only when the incontinence is persistent prior to admission, is present at discharge
or persists for at least seven days.
a. Should coders use the information in the first paragraph of the ACS to determine if the incontinence
is 'clinically significant' before following the classification advice in the second paragraph or is
this paragraph for information only?
b. When following the classification advice in the second paragraph, would a code for incontinence
be assigned for any patient, with any length of stay (including same day) admitted for any condition
who was incontinent once only, providing it was on their day of discharge. That is, would you assign
an additional code for incontinence for a same day admission of an elderly patient where voluminous
incontinence is noted but is not the principal reason for admission?
c. Does this ACS cover all types of urinary incontinence or only those classifiable to R32 Unspecified
urinary incontinence
R32 Unspecified urinary incontinence and R15 Faecal incontinence should be assigned if they meet the
criteria in ACS 0001 Principal diagnosis or ACS 0002 Additional diagnoses.
Additionally, advice in ACS 1808 Incontinence should be followed. Therefore, in answer to part (a) of
this query, the first paragraph is for information only.
In answer to part (b), coders should apply the advice in the second paragraph where the intent is to
code 'persistent' faecal and/or urinary incontinence. So, for a same day episode of care, the advice
to assign a code for incontinence present at discharge should only be followed where the documentation
confirms that incontinence is a persistent problem.
Lastly, in answer to part (c), the advice in ACS 1808 is for urinary incontinence classifiable to R32
Unspecified urinary incontinence, only. It does not apply to other types of urinary incontinence e.g.
overflow, stress incontinence etc.
+ Intercostal neuralgia
What is the correct code assignment for intercostal neuralgia?
The current index entries under Neuralgia and Neuritis do not include a subterm for intercostal. This
may lead coders to assign G58.8 Other specified mononeuropathies. However, the index entry for Neuropathy
has a subterm for intercostal, which assigns G58.0 Intercostal neuropathy, which is the correct code
assignment for intercostal neuralgia.
Indexing improvements to this area of ICD-10-AM have been made for Seventh Edition.
+ In vitro fertilisation (IVF)
Please clarify the advice under In vitro fertilisation (IVF) in ACS 1437 Infertility concerning
the assignment of an additional code from N97 Female infertility.
1437 INFERTILITY
In vitro fertilisation (IVF)
When a female is admitted specifically for IVF procedures, and the principal diagnosis is 'IVF' or 'infertility',
Z31.2 In vitro fertilisation should be assigned as the principal diagnosis code. An additional code
from category N97 Female infertility, for the type of infertility may be assigned if known, including
N97.4 Female infertility associated with male factors.
The intent of the advice in the above paragraph is that female patients admitted specifically for 'IVF'
with documented 'infertility' should have Z31.2 In vitro fertilisation assigned as the principal diagnosis.
A code classifiable to N97 Female infertility should be assigned as an additional code to specify the
type of infertility, including N97.9 Female infertility, unspecified for female infertility NOS. It
is not necessary to assign a code from category N97 if the reason for the IVF is not specified or it
is performed for another reason.
+ Ischaemic fingers
Ischaemic fingers due to occlusion of blood vessel secondary to injecting crushed benzodiazepine
tablets into the ulnar artery.
What is the correct code assignment for the above scenario?
The correct codes to assign for this scenario are:
T42.4 Poisoning by antiepileptic, sedative-hypnotic and antiparkinsonism drugs, Benzodiazepines
I77.8 Other specified disorders of arteries and arterioles
and the appropriate external cause of injury codes.
Assign a more specific code if the type of blood vessel occlusion is specified e.g. I74.2 Embolism and
thrombosis of arteries of upper extremities for thrombosis of ulnar artery.
+ Neonatal withdrawal due to maternal use of prescribed medication.
What is the correct code to assign for a neonate suffering withdrawal due to maternal use of prescribed
pain medication during pregnancy?
The correct code to assign for the neonate in this scenario is P96.1 Neonatal withdrawal symptoms from
maternal use of drugs of addiction following the index pathway:
Reaction
- drug NEC
- - withdrawal
- - - newborn P96.1
The assignment of this code is not affected by whether or not the mother is drug dependent.
+ Parafoveal telangiectasia
What is the correct code assignment for parafoveal telangiectasia treated by Avastin® injection
into retinal blood vessels?
Parafoveal or perifoveal telangiectasia, also known as macular telangiectasis, is a peculiar retinal
vascular disorder that affects the central portion of the macula.
Dilated retinal capillaries occur around the temporal aspect of the foveal area, eventually encircling
it completely causing progressive loss of vision.
The correct code to assign for parafoveal telangiectasia is H35.0 Background retinopathy and retinal vascular changes following the pathway:
Disease, diseased
- retina, retinal
- - vascular lesion H35.0
or
Lesion
- retina, retinal
- - vascular H35.0
Avastin®(Bevacizumab) works by blocking a substance known as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).
Blocking or inhibiting VEGF helps prevent further growth of blood vessels. Initially, the drug was approved
for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer to block blood vessels that the cancer needs to continue
growing.
More recently ophthalmologists have injected Avastin® into the posterior chamber of the eye to treat
age related macular degeneration and other eye conditions that cause loss of vision due to abnormal
growth of blood vessels in the back of the eye, such as parafoveal telangiectasia. The drug was used
because research indicated that VEGF is one of the causes for the growth of the abnormal vessels that
cause these conditions.
The correct code to assign for Avastin® injection into abnormal retinal blood vessels is 42740-03
[209] Administration of therapeutic agent into posterior chamber following the index pathway:
Injection
- posterior chamber (by paracentesis) (eye) (therapeutic agent) 42740-03 [209]
The NCCH will consider improvements to the index for this condition and procedure for a future edition
of ICD-10-AM/ACHI.
+ Periductal mastitis
What is the correct code to assign for periductal mastitis?
The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), used
in the United States, assigns periductal mastitis to mammary duct ectasia while ICD-10-AM makes no such
link.
A literature review reveals that periductal mastitis has been confused with and called duct ectasia.
However, duct ectasia is almost certainly a separate condition affecting an older age group and characterised
by subareolar duct dilatation and less pronounced and less active periductal inflammation. Current evidence
suggests that smoking is an important factor in the aetiology of periductal mastitis but not in duct
ectasia.
Therefore, the correct code to assign for periductal mastitis is N61 Inflammatory disorders of breast following the index pathway:
Mastitis (acute) (infective) (nonpuerperal) (subacute) N61
+ Poisoning
ACS 1901 Poisoning states that 'In addition to the code for poisoning, an additional code should
be assigned to indicate any significant manifestation (e.g. coma, arrhythmia).'
In a scenario where a patient is transferred to an Intensive Care Unit (sedated/ventilated) from
another hospital following carbon monoxide poisoning/benzodiazepine overdose and it is noted that an
arrhythmia was treated at the scene, can this ACS be applied (i.e. can a code for the arrhythmia be
assigned) at the receiving hospital where the condition is no longer present?
ACS 1901 Poisoning intends to provide guidance on the sequencing of code assignment for poisoning episodes
of care. It highlights that in addition to a code from the poisoning chapter an additional code may
be assigned for any 'significant manifestations.' It was not intended to expand the interpretation of
'significant manifestations.'
Coders should follow the criteria in ACS 0001 Principal diagnosis or ACS 0002 Additional diagnoses to
determine if a code for a manifestation of poisoning should be assigned.
+ Pyelonephritis with renal calculus and hydronephrosis
What is the correct code assignment for pyelonephritis with renal calculus and hydronephrosis?
The correct code assignment for pyelonephritis with calculus and hydronephrosis is N13.2 Hydronephrosis
with renal and ureteral calculus obstruction following the pathway:
Pyelonephritis
- with calculus
- - - with hydronephrosis N13.2
If the condition is documented with an infection, N13.6 Pyonephrosis may also be assigned with an additional
code (B95-B97) to identify any infectious agent, to complete the clinical picture. See also ACS 0027
Multiple coding and ACS 0033 Conventions used in the tabular list of diseases.
+ Soft tissue injuries (STIs)
Can you clarify ACS 1331 Soft tissue injuries, particularly in relation to contusions which are
classified as superficial injuries rather than soft tissue injuries?
Soft tissue injuries include damage to muscles, ligaments and tendons. They usually fall into one of the following:
- contusions (bruises)
- sprains
- strains
A contusion is an injury to soft tissue often produced by a blunt force such as a kick,
fall or blow.
A sprain is an injury to a ligament and is often caused by a wrench or twist.
While a strain is an injury to a muscle or tendon and is often caused by overuse, force
or stretching.
ACS 1331 Soft tissue injuries advises that where a more specific injury is documented (e.g. contusion,
sprain or strain), these should be coded rather than following the index pathway 'Injury, site.'
Where soft tissue injury is the only description documented for an injury, assign a code by following
the index pathway 'Injury, site.'
ICD-10-AM, as per ICD-10, classifies 'contusion' as a superficial injury, however, this does not alter
the classification advice above.
The NCCH will review ACS 1331 Soft tissue injuries for a future edition of the ACS.
+ Bibliography
ASGE, Technology Status Evaluation Report Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Vol 50, NO. 6, 1999, Duodenoscope-Assisted
Cholangiopancreatoscopy. Accessed 1 December 2008.
http://louisville.edu/medschool/medicine/gastro/media/ASGE%20Manual/content/7/7-08.pdf
Avastin®(Bevacizumab) Intravitreal Injection, 2003 The Eye Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania. Accessed 13 May 2009. http://www.eyehospital.com.au/brochures/avastin_intravitreal_injection.pdf
Bowers, K, The Alfred Hospital, Inflammatory Diseases of the Breast. Accessed 12 May 2009. http://www.surgeons.org/AM/presentations/KBowers_050219.pdf
Dixon, J.M, ABC of Breast Diseases: Breast Infection, BMJ 1994;309:946-949 (8 October). Accessed 12 May 2009. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/309/6959/946
Thompson, C.C, Kelsey.P.B., Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, 19(5):487-491, 2003, Duodenoscope-assisted Cholangiopancreatoscopy: A Review of Clinical Applications. Accessed 1 December 2008. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/460478
MedGadget, SpyglassDirect Visualization System to Cure ERCP Addiction. Accessed 1 February 2009. http://medgadget.com/archives/2007/05/spyglass_direct_visualization_system_makes_ercps.html
VirtualMedicalCentre.com, PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) Testing. Accessed 20 March 2009. http://www.virtualcancercentre.com/healthinvestigations.asp?sid=67
Vitreous-Retina-Macula Consultants of New York, Idiopathic perifoveal telangiectasia. Accessed 3 March 2009. http://www.vrmny.com/pe/ipt.html
+ Coding diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation (IGR)
Note: The following advice on diabetes mellitus also applies to impaired glucose regulation (IGR)
During the 2008 Sixth Edition Coding Workshops, the NCCH emphasised that diabetes mellitus must meet
ACS 0002 Additional diagnoses to be coded. The education highlighted that routine BSLs do not fall under
the ACS 0002 criteria for 'increased clinical care and/or monitoring' and therefore can not be used
by coders to determine when to code diabetes mellitus and any associated conditions.
It is acknowledged that there may be some variation in the way that diabetes mellitus is coded in Sixth
Edition, mainly due to how the index deals with diabetes and its associated conditions. Coders should
continue to code diabetes as they have been and follow the advice published as a 10-AM Commandment in
Coding Matters, Volume 15, No.1, June 2008 Diabetes mellitus and blood sugar levels. The NCCH in conjunction
with the Coding Standards Advisory Committee (CSAC) recognises that there will be instances throughout
the life of Sixth Edition where coding advice on diabetes will be sought. It is therefore recommended
that coding queries related to diabetes mellitus be dealt with at the state level during Sixth Edition.
+ Apophysiodesis of femur
What is the correct intervention code to assign for apophysiodesis of the femur?
The correct code to assign for apophysiodesis of the femur is 48500-00 [1491] Epiphysiodesis of femur.
Clinical advice confirms that an apophysiodesis is the same as an epiphysiodesis of the femur, except
that it is performed at the proximal end of the femur rather than the distal end, which is more common.
Clinical advice also indicated that:
"Technically a growth point that leads to a muscle attachment is an apophysis whereas a growth plate
to a joint is an epiphysis." Courtenay, Brett (personal communication, Orthopaedic Clinician).
+ Creation of arteriovenous fistulas for dialysis treatment
When should Z49.0 Preparatory care for dialysis be assigned for an admission for creation of an
arteriovenous fistula and when should a complication code from category T82 Complications of cardiac
and vascular prosthetic devices, implants and grafts be assigned?
Z49.0 Preparatory care for dialysis should be assigned for those admissions where the intention is for
creation of a new fistula in preparation to commence dialysis treatment. Where the reason for creation
of a new fistula is due to a complication relating to an existing fistula (even when the new fistula
is being created at a different site), then assign the appropriate complication code from category T82
Complications of cardiac and vascular prosthetic devices, implants and grafts with external cause codes
Y84.1 Kidney dialysis and Y92.22 Health service area.
+ External cause codes for renal dialysis
What is the correct external cause code assignment for complications related to renal dialysis?
Ureteral stents are an integral part of urological practice. Stents can migrate, fragment or be forgotten
and a portion of these will become calcified. Treatment to render a patient stent-free in these circumstances
includes ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephroscopy, cystoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy, extracorporeal
shock wave lithotripsy, open cysto-litholapaxy and simple nephrectomy - or a combination of the above.
The correct code to assign for endoscopic lithotripsy of an encrusted ureteric stent is 36809-00 [1074]
Endoscopic fragmentation of ureteric calculus. Calcified encrustation is considered calculous material,
therefore, the correct pathway is Destruction, calculus, ureter. Assign also a code for removal of ureteric
stent as appropriate
+ Excoriation skin of breast
What is the correct code to assign for non traumatic excoriation of skin of breast?
Non traumatic excoriation of skin of breast is also known as intertrigo.
Intertrigo is inflammation of skinfolds caused by skin-on-skin friction or chafing of warm, moist skin in areas such as the inner thighs and genitalia, the armpits, under the breasts, under abdominal folds, behind the ears and the web spaces between the fingers and toes.
The condition is particularly common in obese patients who are exposed to high heat and humidity, but it can occur in anyone.
The correct code to assign for non traumatic excoriation of skin of breast is L30.4 Erythema intertrigo.
+ Failure to progress in labour
What is the correct code to assign for failure to progress in labour?
Failure to progress in labour is a description rather than a diagnostic term, therefore a code for the
underlying condition resulting in failure to progress should be assigned. Underlying causes may include
cephalopelvic disproportion, malpresentation, inefficient uterine action, (primary uterine inertia or
secondary uterine inertia), cervical dystocia, maternal exhaustion etc.
In the absence of documentation of an underlying cause for failure to progress, clinical advice indicates
that the correct code to assign is O62.9 Abnormalities of forces of labour, unspecified.
+ Glaucoma with diabetes mellitus
For a diabetic patient with glaucoma NOS is it appropriate to assign E1-.39 * Diabetes mellitus
with other specified ophthalmic complication and H40.9 Glaucoma, unspecified?
There is no index entry for 'Diabetes, with glaucoma' in ICD-10-AM, therefore E1-.39 * Diabetes mellitus
with other specified ophthalmic complication should not be assigned in this scenario.
+ Macular degeneration with diabetes mellitus
Should E1-.34 * Diabetes mellitus with other retinopathy be assigned in addition to H35.3 Degeneration
of macula and posterior pole in a patient with macular degeneration and diabetes mellitus?
There is no index entry for 'Diabetes, with macular degeneration' in ICD-10-AM. Clinical advice indicates
that there is no cause and effect relationship between macular degeneration and diabetes mellitus and
it is therefore, inappropriate to assign E1-.34 * Diabetes mellitus with other retinopathy in the above
scenario. These conditions should be coded separately unless the clinician clearly documents a link
such as diabetic maculopathy.
+ Sympathetic storm following traumatic brain injury
What is the correct code to assign for sympathetic storm following traumatic brain injury?
Sympathetic storming occurs in 15% to 33% of patients with severe traumatic brain injury who are comatose.
It is an exaggerated stress response marked by agitation or restlessness and can be associated with
fever, posturing, tachycardia, hypertension and diaphoresis. It is thought to be caused by an increase
in activity of the sympathetic nervous system created by a disassociation or loss of balance between
the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems.
In addition to coding out the traumatic brain injury the NCCH advises that sympathetic storm should
be classified to G90.8 Other disorders of autonomic nervous system by following the pathway(s):
Disorder
- autonomic nervous system
-- specified NEC G90.8
or
Imbalance
- autonomic G90.8
or
Imbalance
- sympathetic G90.8
Assign also codes for manifestations of the sympathetic storm, as appropriate, if they meet the criteria
in ACS 0002 Additional diagnoses.
+ Unspecified gastroenteritis complicating pregnancy
What is the correct code to assign for unspecified gastroenteritis complicating pregnancy?
The correct code assignment for unspecified gastroenteritis complicating pregnancy is 098.8 Other maternal
infectious and parasitic diseases complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium and A09.9 Gastroenteritis
and colitis of unspecified origin.
+ Bibliography
Cauni, V, Geaviete, P, Georgescu, D, Mircliulescu, V. and Persu, C, Urology, Vol 68, Supplement 1, Novemeber
2006, Page 208, V-03.05 Endoscopic treatment in calcified ureteral stents. Accessed 26 August 2008.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science
DermIS, Dermatology Information System, Intertrigo. Accessed 1 February 2009.
http://dermis.multimedica.de/dermisroot/en/12933/diagnose.htm
Janniger, C.K, Schwartz R.A, Szepietowski, J.C and Reich, A. American Family Physician, Sept 1, 2005,
Intertrigo and Common Secondary Skin Infections. Accessed 1 February 2009.
http://www.aafp.org/afp/20050901/833.html
Lemke, D.M, Critical Care Nurse Vol 27, No. 1, February 2007, Sympathetic Storming After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Accessed 9 December 2008.
http://ccn.aacnjournals.org
Lemke, D.M, Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 36 (1):4-9, 2004, Riding Out the Storm: Sympathetic Storming after Traumatic Brain Injury.
Accessed 9 December 2008.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/469858
Monga, M, Klein, E, Castaneda-Zuniga, W.R, and Thomas, R, The Journal of Urology, Volume 153, issue 6, June 1995, Pages 1817-1819, The Forgotten Indwelling Ureteral Stent: A Urological Dilemma.
Accessed 26 August 2008.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science